Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hedrick v. Padon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1958No. 37568Published

1DissentHalley, Justice

Due to the fact that I think the majority opinion overlooks salient facts in this case and has made too narrow an application of the legal principles involved, I dissent to it.

The Warren Employee Pension Trust for which the defendants, J. A. Padon, Don M. Mattocks and A. J. Murphy are the trustees, is the owner of the entire block between Thirteenth and Fourteenth Streets and Boulder and Cheyenne Avenues in Tulsa except the lot owned by the plaintiffs. It is the owner of ninety-two per cent of the entire area of the block. The buildings that were being erected on the four south lots of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. People Ex Rel. Franchere v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. McKay v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Blanding v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API