Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2008No. 32A01-0802-PC-77PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Jesse Lindsey III appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Lindsey raises a single issue for our review, namely, whether the Indiana Penal Code of 1977, now codified at Ind.Code §§ 35-41-1-1 to 50-8-1, is based on “vindictive justice” and contrary to Article I, Section 18 of the Indiana Constitution.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts and procedural history relevant to Lindsey’s current appeal were stated in this court’s memorandum decision on his direct appeal:

Approximately two weeks prior…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Derrell Woods v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Timothy Ladana Hazelwood v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. A.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API