Taylor v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Kevin Taylor appeals the post-conviction court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Taylor raises two issues for our review, one of which is dispositive: whether the post-conviction court erred when it found that Taylor had not received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.1
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This court recently reviewed the facts and procedural history of Taylor's case:
On the evening of May 19, 20083, Taylor, [eo-defendant Kelly Seott] Thomas, and Stacy Lynn Orue went to Gwen Hunt's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phillip L. White v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Dustin James Mahler v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Manuel Ocasio, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Matthew Fiandt v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.