State v. Dallas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county charged with the crime of robbery in the first degree. Defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree and in person pleaded guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. The case was tried in the district court before Eish, J., and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery in the first degree and appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. Defendant contends that the evidence-is not sufficient to sustain the verdict.
This contention is not based on the claim that there was no evidence *93tending to prove defendant’s guilt, for John Lakos, the man who was robbed, and also the witness West testified directly and -positively to the fact of the robbery and that defendant was one of the two men who committed it, but is based on -the claim that the testimony of Lakos at the trial in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Veeder v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929