Legal Opinion

Van Sandt v. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1954No. 8 Div. 617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit in equity -brought by complainant, appellant here, and seeks a declaratory judgment holding that local act No. 466, approved September 15, 1959, Local Acts 1959, page 280, is unconstitutional because in violation of section 105 of the Constitution of 1901. A final decree was rendered which upheld the act against that attack, except as to section 11 of it which made provision for minimum prices and hours for barbers’ services. That section of said act was held unconstitutional pursuant to a stipulation of the parties made at the hearing and trial. It was also then argued that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. Limestone CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Lisenba v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Couch v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Johnson v. State Ex Rel. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Talley v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. In re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Parrish v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API