Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. Limestone County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1929No. 8 Div. 134PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.

(after stating the case as above). The purpose of the appeal is to test the constitutionality of the legislative act and the order of the commissioners’ court.

1. The act is first assailed as in violation of subdivision 15, § 104, of the Constitution, saying: “The Legislature shall not pass a special, private, or local law. * * * “Regulating either the assessment or collection of taxes,” etc. (Italics supplied.)

Clearly the act is a local law looking to the levy and collection of a local tax.

With equal clearness the title to the act and the order made in pursuance thereof deals with a privilege…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Perry County v. Selma, Marion & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Lott v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Kennamer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Newton v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Dearborn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Baldwin County v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Houston County v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API