Kitchenmaster v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Plaintiffs assert that there was a jury question whether the truck insured by defendant was, at the time of the accident, being driven with the consent of the owner. Defendant contends that there is no evidence in the record from which a jury could infer such consent.
The following are the facts: On August 21, 1943, at about 9 :30 in the evening, plaintiff, Leslie Kitchenmaster, was injured when a farm truck in which he was riding, and which was owned by Delbert Bishop, insured by defendant company, and driven by Charles Funk, failed to negotiate a curve in the road and struck an embankment.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Brochu v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Christiansen v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Bushman v. TomekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Company v. HE Abbott & Sons, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
- Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Boehringer v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. PelczynskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Employer's Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.