Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Lee Snellenberger, AKA Michael Lee Cutter, Michael Lee Davidson, Robert Eugene Frehly, Cutter Snellenberger, "Cutter"

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2007No. 06-50169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a minute order, coupled with a charging document, may be sufficient under Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005), to establish a prior crime of violence for purposes of sentence enhancement. We have previously noted that a minute order is “not a judicial record that can be relied upon” to establish the nature of a prior conviction. United States v. Diaz-Argueta, 447 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.2006). We now explicitly so hold.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In March 2005, Michael Lee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. SnellenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. People v. TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Hernandez-Aguilar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Polikarpovas v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Retuta v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API