Legal Opinion

Hernandez-Aguilar v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2007No. 06-71945Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Rolando Hernandez-Aguilar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Parrilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2005). Reviewing de novo, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2005), we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The government did not meet its burden of proving that Hernandez-Aguilar is inadmissible under 8, U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Ireneo P. Parrilla v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Jose Reyes Ruiz-Vidal v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Anibal Jose Diaz-ArguetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API