Miller v. Lachman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Case by Grant E. Miller against Henry Lachman for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s wife. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought to recover damages which the plaintiff claims to have sustained by the wrongful and willful conduct of the defendant in alienating the affections of plaintiff’s wife, breaking up and destroying his home; for aiding, counseling, and assisting plaintiff’s wife in procuring a divorce; and for having debauched and carnally known her.
It appears that in July, 1895, the plaintiff and his *69faipüy, consisting of his wife and three daughters, the eldest of whom was then nine years of age, were living in the village of Lisbon, Ottawa county. The defendant lived on a farm about one…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maclean v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Henry C. Hart Manufacturing Co. v. Mann's Boudoir Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Herbert v. DurgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Bates v. KitchelMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Pierson v. Illinois Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Friedman v. CraigWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.