People v. Mack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*865The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and oral statements he made to law enforcement officials. The initial encounter between the defendant and the police was lawful from its inception inasmuch as the arresting officer had an objective, credible reason to approach the defendant to request information (see People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181 [1992]; People v Davis, 78 AD3d 724, 725 [2010]; People v Hill, 72 AD3d 702 [2010]; People v Ferrell, 266 AD2d 560 [1999]). Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FelicianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. McNeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.