Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Hammers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 22, 1955No. 36979PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an action for damages for breach ■of contract, brought by H. A. Pruitt as plaintiff, against H. M. Hammers, as defendant. The trial court denied plaintiff the relief sought, upon the grounds that the matter was res judicata. Plaintiff has appealed. The parties will be referred to as ■they appeared in the trial court.
In 1948, while the owner of an unplatted tract of land in the City of Ardmore, Oklahoma, the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant, which had for its purpose the subdivision of said realty into lots and blocks and the marketing of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ward v. Mid-West & Gulf Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Vinson v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Sklarsky v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Sandlin v. PharoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Covington v. AnthonySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Citizens State Bank of Hugo v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Dodds v. LaganCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979