State v. Bryant
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
— The question is whether one county prosecutor may bind another county to a use/derivative use immunity agreement without the latter’s knowledge and/or consent. Specifically, we have been asked to hold that an informal immunity agreement entered into by one prosecuting attorney is binding upon a neighboring prosecuting attorney; we decline to do so. We have also been asked to hold one county is estopped from using witness evidence, which had been suppressed as impermissible fruit of a bargained for immunity agreement in another county; we decline to do so. We do hold, however, under the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William Eugene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.