Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2002No. 69788-4PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

— The question is whether one county prosecutor may bind another county to a use/derivative use immunity agreement without the latter’s knowledge and/or consent. Specifically, we have been asked to hold that an informal immunity agreement entered into by one prosecuting attorney is binding upon a neighboring prosecuting attorney; we decline to do so. We have also been asked to hold one county is estopped from using witness evidence, which had been suppressed as impermissible fruit of a bargained for immunity agreement in another county; we decline to do so. We do hold, however, under the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. William Eugene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API