Legal Opinion

Feist v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1950No. File 7196, 7197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

This opinion covers appeals in two separate proceedings that were instituted before the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau by two different parties, namely, Andrew Feist and Lena Feist.

Andrew Feist applied to the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau for compensation for an injury arising in the course of employment, that is, for a disease fairly traceable to the employment. The Compensation Bureau denied the claim on the ground that there was “insufficient proof or evidence that the disability suffered by. the claimant was proximately caused by or fáirly traceable to his employment.” Andrew Feist died…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Tweten v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foss v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gullickson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lippmann v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Feist v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API