Legal Opinion

Barton v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This case is before us on the allowance of the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review following a decision by the Appeals Court that the Commonwealth is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution from retrying Edward R. Barton, Jr. (the defendant) on two felony indictments after his initial trial ended in a mistrial. Barton v. Commonwealth, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 688 (1981). We agree with the Appeals Court that there was no manifest necessity for the declaration of a mistrial, and that the defendant’s motion to dismiss should have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StewardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. DensonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Collins v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. CassidyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. HorriganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API