Wright v. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana)
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.
Plaintiff seeks in an injunction action ike abatement of a claimed nuisance, which is caused, as claimed in plaintiff’s substituted petition, by the operation by defendant of a gasoline and oil filling station in Corydon, Iowa. The defend ant in its answer and in a preliminary hearing in the district court raised the proposition that Lee Middlebrook is the tenant and operator of the station and that he is a necessary party to the case. The trial court held that Middlebrook, as tenant, is not only a proper party but is also a necessary party to the action. Upon application to this court,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Barmore v. DarraghCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- People Ex Rel. Corwin v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Tod v. CrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
- Ditch v. HessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Mauer v. RohdeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- United Security Insurance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Local Union 499 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Iowa Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.