California Nursery Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMadden, Judge
I disagree with the opinion of the court as to the sum of $1,451.87 which is included in the judgment. This sum represents the increased costs incurred by the contractor in performing the contract down to the time when the work was accepted by the Government. Since, as is shown by the findings and the opinion, the work was completed and accepted on June 5, 1984, and the plaintiff’s claim under the 1934 act was not filed until March 11, 1935, that claim was filed too late if June 5 was the date of “completion of the contract,” within the meaning of that act.
The opinion of the court treats the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coffey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Holmes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Taylor Bros. v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.