Legal Opinion
Taylor Bros. v. Gill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1927No. 17605PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The parties to this action appear in this court in the same relation as in the district court.
The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendants for the balance alleged to be due them on account of having furnished to the defendants certain plumbing fixtures together with labor performed in installing the same.
One of the defendants, John Semke, had entered into a contract with the defendant Mattie Gill to erect a certain building on a lot located in the Harndale addition of Oklahoma City.
Semke during the progress of the work made a contract with the plaintiffs to furnish and install…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bryan v. Orient Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Holmes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Congdon v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- H. E. Leonhardt Lumber Co. v. Ed Wamble Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Dolese Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.