Legal Opinion

United States v. Cameron David Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1977No. 75-1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The issue is whether a 1950 Presidential proclamation of a national emergency applies to sustain a prosecution for sabotage committed in 1969. Defendant was convicted of three counts of an indictment for sabotage and sentenced to concurrent seven-year terms. We reverse.

The indictment charges that with intent to interfere with, and obstruct, defense activities of the United States the defendant-appellant Bishop wilfully injured and destroyed four high voltage line towers of the Public Service Company of Colorado by use of dynamite. The towers were part of a 230,000…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. David v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. KabatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Esmerejidado GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., a Corporation, Walter J. Spawr and Frances A. Spawr, IndividualsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Jose CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API