Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dixie Fuel Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1995No. 94-SC-623-WCPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Claimant sought compensation benefits, alleging two work-related injuries. One injury occurred in 1989 and the other in 1990. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that claimant was 100% occupationally disabled. Of that disability, the ALJ determined that 20% was caused by the 1989 injury which was time-barred and, therefore, noncompensable; 40% was caused by the 1990 injury, alone, and was the liability of the employer; and 40% was due to the arousal of a previously dormant condition by the 1990 injury and was the liability of the Special Fund. No petition for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Eaton Axle Corp. v. NallyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Vessels Ex Rel. Vessels v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wheatley v. Bryant Auto ServiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Osborne v. Pepsi-ColaKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cepero v. Fabricated Metals Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brasch-Barry General Contractors v. JonesKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hodges v. Sager Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wal-Mart v. SouthersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  5. Breeding v. Colonial Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API