Legal Opinion
J.S. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2002No. S-9722PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Jack's 1 parental rights were terminated as to his sons Avery, Lyle, and Carl after Jack was convicted of five counts of sexual abuse against them. Jack claims several errors were made by the superior court. Because we find that the superior court did not need to require active efforts under the Indian Child Welfare Act, we uphold the termination of Jack's parental rights.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
This case involves the termination of Jack's parental rights to his three sons: Avery, Lyle, and Carl. Avery was born in June 1988. Lyle and Carl,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- A.B.M. v. M.H.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interest of J.S.B., Jr., Minor Child and Concerning J.S.B., Sr. and O.L.J.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- WILSON W. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Casey K. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Samaniego v. City of KodiakAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.