Simpson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of delivery of a simulated controlled substance. V.A.C.S. 4476-15b, § 2(a)(1). After finding “true” the two enhancement paragraphs, the trial judge sentenced appellant to 30 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.1 The court of appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction.2 Simpson v. State, 787 S.W.2d 539 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review because the appellate court’s decision conflicts with the Fourteenth Court of…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Few v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Simpson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
4Cited by2 opinions
- Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001