Legal Opinion
Pines, Inc. v. Bossingham
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 1998No. 21689, 23277PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, Pines, Inc. asserts that the district court erred by awarding summary judgment in the underlying cases. Pines also claims the district court erred in awarding attorney fees and by denying Pines’ motion to vacate the judgment on the final lawsuit. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
*715i.
BACKGROUND
These consolidated appeals arose out of a dispute concerning a small piece of real property owned by James Bossingham located adjacent to an off-ramp for State Highway 95 in Coeur d’Alene. The property is also adjacent to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Powell v. SellersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sanders v. Kuna Joint School DistrictIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Loavenbruck v. RohrbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Burcalow Family, LLC v. Corral Bar, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
- Picatti v. MinerIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Burcalow Family, LLC v. Corral Bar, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.