Legal Opinion

Meyer, Bannerman & Co. v. Keefer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1899No. 8768PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Meyer, Bannerman & Co. commenced an action in the county court of Cass county, aided by attachment, to recover from William G-. Keefer the sum of $817.83 for gopdg alleged to tidy® t>een $old gnd deliyered, Til® <Mfi’ *221davit for attachment sets forth several of the statutory grounds for the issuance of the writ, a proper bond was filed by the plaintiffs, an order of attachment was issued, and property of the defendant was seized thereunder. Subsequently he filed a motion to dissolve the attachment for the reason the allegations contained in the affidavit for attachment are untrue, and because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. C. Rudolf & Co. v. R. L. McDonald & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Deere, Wells & Co. v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. First National Bank v. GeeenwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Danker v. JacobsNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mahoney v. SalsburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thielen v. SchechingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Wagner v. WolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API