Legal Opinion

Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3037PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of a large variety of articles embraced in two shipments, one brought by the steamship De Grasse and the other by the Deutschland, and covered by two entries and protests, each of which presents the same issues. The importations were in the form of artificial flowers, fruits, and leaves represented by some 36 different exhibits. They were classified and assessed by the collector at 90 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922 providing for a large number of articles beginning with—

Laces, * * * nets and nettings, * *…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Beuttell & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. United States v. Hurst & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API