Legal Opinion

Blumenthal v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2709PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Clusters, sprays, and wreaths of artificial flowers, fruits, and leaves, made of silk or cotton yarns, threads, and filaments, imported at the port of New York, were classified by the collector as trimmings or Ornaments, and assessed for duty at 90 per centum ad valorem, under that part of paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

Pab. 1430. Laces * * * trimmings * * * ornaments * * * all the foregoing, finished or unfinished, * * * by whatever name known and to whatever use applied and whether or not named, described, or provided for elsewhere in this Act, when composed…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Maupin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Olivier Straw Goods Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API