Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Paper Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 2, 1964No. C.D. 2438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The seven protests here involved, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, relate to several importations of merchandise invoiced generally as “ ‘Safir’ Lampshade Parchmentized Paper [or] Bristol Board.” It was classified as bristol board, embossed or decorated, 'valued at more than 15 Cents per pound, within the purview of paragraph 1407(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, or by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Great Lakes Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. John J. Coates Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Purveyors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Zwiebel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. H. Cohen Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Louis Marx & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Mutual Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API