Legal Opinion
S & S SERVICES, INC. v. Rogers
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided January 14, 1999No. Case 91-207PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Chief Judge
MEMORANDUM
S&S Services, Inc. ["S&S"] has moved for summary judgment in this case involving the reputed transfer of title to Parcel No. 56-79 Estate Frydenhal ["the Parcel"]. S&S seeks judgment that the defendant, Laurenceteen Rogers Chapman ["Rogers Chapman"], has no legal claim to title in the Parcel, that Rogers Chapman wrongfully maintains physical possession of the Parcel, and that S&S is the rightful owner of the Parcel.
Plaintiffs Soogan and Chandrika Rajbir [the "Rajbirs"] are wife and husband, as well as sister and brother-in-law of Siewdath Sookram ["Sookram"], principle shareholder…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Etienne GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Callwood v. Virgin Islands National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. ChristopherSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Prime Hospitality Corp. v. General Star Indemnity Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
- Milligan v. KhodraDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004