Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of the Child of B.J.-M.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2008No. A07-272PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
The Hennepin County Human Services Department (the County) filed a petition to terminate parental rights in relation to minor child T.W. The petition listed B.J.M. as the child’s mother and named her as *670a party to the proceeding, but did not name the child’s father, H.W., as a party. Instead, H.W. was listed as the alleged father and therefore only a participant in the litigation. On the first day of the scheduled trial on the termination of B.J.’M.’s parental rights, however, H.W. appeared in the action for the first time and acknowledged that he and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Matter of Welfare of HGBSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re Bj-M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.