Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge.
The two basic questions presented in this review of a. workman’s compensation award are:
Was the petitioner’s claim timely filed? and
Can there be a compensable injury in the absence of a single event which bears a causal relationship to the claimed injury?
We answer both questions in the affirmative and affirm the award.
Betty L. Barbee (petitioner), except for a brief period of time, was employed by El Rancho Markets (El Rancho) from sometime in 1969 until she voluntarily resigned in mid-1973. Her resignation was upon the recommendation of her doctor. The petitioner’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- Quaker Oats Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Reilly v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975