Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 8, 1986No. 1 CA-IC 3389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

This is a review of a consolidated Industrial Commission award entered in a workers’ compensation proceeding granting reopening of a 1975 claim but denying compensability of a 1984 new injury claim. We must decide whether there is a new injury if the sole effect of recent work activity is to exacerbate the symptoms of an already symptomatic back condition, but where this exacerbation requires new medical treatment and causes increased disability. Because such an exacerbation is a new injury, we set aside the award.

The respondent employee (claimant) first injured his back…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Caganich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Temple v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
  2. Demetrulias v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Johnson-Manley Lumber v. INDUS. COM'N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Mandex, Inc. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API