Legal Opinion

Martin G. Plotkin v. USA

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 13, 2012No. 11-12367UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Martin Plotkin appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint alleging: (1) constitutional violations pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (Count One); (2) wrongful disclosure of tax return information, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103 and 7431 (Count Two); and (3) instigation of an unauthorized collection action, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7433 (Count Three). After review, we affirm. 1

I. BACKGROUND FACTS

A. Conviction and Probation

In 1999, Plotkin was convicted in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Randall v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Exford v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
  2. Galloway v. City of AbbevilleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
  3. Almond v. ClarkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  4. Hughes v. LocureDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023
  5. McWaters v. TalleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API