Hall v. Nash
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the District Court'of Pueblo County: Hon. N. W. Dixon, Judge. On Rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell
Plaintiff in error instituted this suit December 7,1899, in behalf of himself and other stockholders of The Matoa Leasing &' Mining Company, who would come in and contribute to the expenses of the suit.
Trial to the court resulted in judgment of dismissal with costs against plaintiff, to review which is this writ of error.
The facts, as they appeared by the pleadings and the evidence, were as follows:
*502The Matoa Leasing & Mining Company was organized about June 1, 1896, for the purpose of acquiring a mining lease, held by one Jackson, on block 1 of the Half Moon mining claim, Cripple Creek…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. JewettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Valleyview Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Fitzwater v. NorcrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1907