Moore v. P. W. Publishing Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
It is apparent that the validity of the plaintiff’s judgment depends upon two questions, One, are the *188words, “Uncle Tom,” libel per se, and two, if such words are not libel per se are the words libel per quod and did the plaintiff, as she must in a case of libel per quod, prove special damages.
To be libelous per se words must be of such a nature that courts can presume as a matter of law that they tend to degrade or disgrace the person of whom they are written or spoken, or hold him up to a public hatred, contempt or scorn. Digest Publishing Co. v. Perry Publishing Co., 284 S. W. 2d 832.
Judge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bigelow v. BrumleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Del Rico Co. v. New Mexican, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Digest Publishing Company v. Perry Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Schaffhauser Bros. v. HemmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Pecyk v. SemoncheckOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Hersh v. GrumerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Croce v. N.Y. Times Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Wagner v. Circle W. MastiffsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.