Legal Opinion

Pecyk v. Semoncheck

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1952No. 22284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*466OPINION

By HUNSICKER, PJ.:

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury.

The plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Walter Pecyk, deceased, filed an action in the Municipal Court of Cleveland, Ohio, against the defendant, Michael Semoncheck, wherein such administrator, Anthony Pecyk, alleged that Semoncheck “did wilfully utter and publish concerning” the father of the plaintiff (who was the plaintiff’s and is now the appellee’s decedent), “false, malicious and defamatory matter” as follows:

“I knew Toney Pecyk’s father for 24 years, and I know he’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fawick Airflex Co. v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, Local 735Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. P. W. Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ward v. Forest Preserve DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Johnson v. NielsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API