Legal Opinion
Gurmankin v. Costanzo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 15, 1980No. 79-1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
This is the third occasion this court has considered an aspect of this litigation. On the first appeal, dealing with the liability issue, we affirmed the holding of the trial court that the policy of the School District of Philadelphia1 which excluded blind teachers from teaching sighted students in the public schools violated the due process rights of appellant, Judith Gurmankin, a blind school teacher, plaintiff in the district court. Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 556 F.2d 184 (3d Cir. 1977), affirming 411 F.Supp. 982 (E.D.Pa.1976). The second appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Jones v. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Thomas A. EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY COMPANY, Etc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Armstead v. PingreeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
- Gayle v. Warden Monmouth County Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Thomas v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.