Legal Opinion

Shantz v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 4, 1975PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of murder in the first degree, 11 Del.C. § 636, on three grounds which we consider seri-atim.

I

The first ground is based on admission into evidence of color photographs of the victim’s body which defendant argues were inflammatory and prejudicial.

Under settled law a trial judge has broad discretion in admitting or rejecting photographs of injuries to a victim and, absent abuse of discretion, the ruling will be sustained on appeal. Lane v. State, Del.Supr., 222 A.2d 263 (1966) ; Bantum v. State, Del.Supr., 7 Terry 487, 85 A.2d 741 (1952).

Here,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Tyre v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API