Shantz v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
Defendant appeals from a conviction of murder in the first degree, 11 Del.C. § 636, on three grounds which we consider seri-atim.
I
The first ground is based on admission into evidence of color photographs of the victim’s body which defendant argues were inflammatory and prejudicial.
Under settled law a trial judge has broad discretion in admitting or rejecting photographs of injuries to a victim and, absent abuse of discretion, the ruling will be sustained on appeal. Lane v. State, Del.Supr., 222 A.2d 263 (1966) ; Bantum v. State, Del.Supr., 7 Terry 487, 85 A.2d 741 (1952).
Here,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Tyre v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.