Legal Opinion

Daniel Arceneaux, Louis Daverede, Jr., Vives Lemmon and Jules Menesses v. Amstar Corp., Amstar Sugar Corp., Tate and Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., and Domino Sugar Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 7, 2016No. 2015-C-0588PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

I iThis case concerns whether the duty to defend in long latency disease cases may be prorated, between insurer and insured when occurrence-based policies provide coverage for only a portion of the time during which exposure occurred. Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) asserts that defense costs are to be prorated among insurers and the insured if there are periods of non-coverage. American Sugar Refining, Inc. (“American Sugar”) asserts that the duty to defend as agreed upon in the policy provides for a complete defense so long as the duty to defend attaches, even if some claims…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. Rossello v. Zurich Amer. InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Guste v. LiretteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Zeno v. Great Southern Coaches of Arkansas, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Lloyd's Syndicate 1861 v. Darwin Nat'l Assurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API