Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Dalluge
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2008No. 79841-9PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Chambers, J.
Criminal sentences often include a period of community custody. By design, the whole “period” of community custody must be served in the community. With an exception that is not relevant to us today, any time an offender spends in jail does not count toward serving a community custody sentence. In the language of the statute, the “period” is “tolled.” RCW 9.94A.625(3).
¶2 Amel Dalluge was serving a year of community custody when he was arrested and taken to jail, where there was an altercation. The Department of Corrections found this altercation violated the terms of Dalluge’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Association of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.