United States v. Rosendahl
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of a single specification of carnal knowledge and three specifications of indecent acts with a minor in violation of Articles 120(b) and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920(b) and 934 (1994)[hereinafter UCMJ]. The charges were a consequence of the appellant’s consensual sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. We specified three issues relating to the possible affirmative defense of mistake of fact on the part of the appellant as to the age of the victim.1 After carefully considering the matters raised…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. RosendahlCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000