Legal Opinion
Matter of Welfare of Jjh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 17, 1989No. CX-89-647PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant contends a trial court order referring his case for adult court prosecution was untimely and unsupported by the evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
The delinquency petition of a Willmar police officer alleges that on September 27, 1988, appellant caused the death of another person by operating a vehicle in a grossly negligent manner, or negligently operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or with at least a .10 alcohol concentration. Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 1 (1988). The petition was filed in December 1988, about one month after appellant turned age 18.
I…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. FribergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of C.T.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In re the Welfare of J.D.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989