Legal Opinion

Amburgey v. Sauder

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2000No. Docket 206373PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This appeal provides this Court with its first opportunity to construe the Equine Activity Liability Act (eala), MCL 691.1661 et seq:, MSA 12.418(1) et seq. Plaintiff Sharon Amburgey claims injuries to her right arm and left shoulder as a result of having been bitten by a horse named Justin. At the time, Justin was owned by Linda Predhomme. 1 Defendant Marilyn Sauder owns and operates the Diamond-S Stables, where the incident in question occurred. Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s July 28, 1997, and September 17, 1997, orders that, respectively, granted defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cox v. Eric J. Hartman, M.D., & Blue Water Obstetrics & Gynecology Prof'l Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Cole v. Ladbroke Racing Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Colista v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Lima Twp v. BatesonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Hubner v. Spring Valley Equestrian CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API