Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Simpson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The ruling of the court sustaining the demurrers is assigned as error. The complaint alleges in substance as follows: For a number of years prior to his death one I. M. Simpson was the owner of a farm in Polk County, Oregon, which had been leased to plaintiff. The lease provided that title to all the crops should be vested in the lessor until the rent was paid; that during this period plaintiff became indebted to said I. M. Simpson in the sum of $2,800, which was evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a chattel mortgage on certain live stock and farm equipment of the alleged value of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friese v. HummelOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. WallOregon Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Snyder v. VannoyOregon Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Harper ex rel. Norton v. HardingClackamas County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1871

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Minter v. MinterMontana Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API