Legal Opinion

Abruzzo v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1975No. 141-73PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam: This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to the opinion, findings of fact,* and conclusion of law filed, July 22, 1974, by Trial Judge Hal D. Cooper pursuant to Rule 134 (h). Upon consideration thereof, together with the briefs of counsel (oral argument having been waived) the court agrees with the trial judge’s opinion as hereinafter set forth. We do not wish to be understood, and do not understand the trial judge as holding, that Correction Boards, under 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a), lack authority to grant backdated promotions in appropriate cases. The court affirms…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Brenner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Denton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Keef v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Doggett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Henry D. THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maj. Gen. John COFFEY, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Sheridon H. Groves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API