Legal Opinion

State v. Delk

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1986No. 1 CA-CR 10280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant raises one issue for our consideration. Is the “anti-plea bargain” provision in A.R.S. § 28-692(C) unconstitutional as violative of Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution? The procedural history of the case is as follows.

Appellant was charged in the Scottsdale City Court with violations of A.R.S. §§ 28-692(A) and (B), both class 1 misdemeanors, and other minor traffic infractions. Prior to trial, he entered into a plea agreement with the State. In the agreement appellant agreed to, and did, plead guilty to driving while intoxicated (DWI), in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. VarelaArizona Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. We Are America/Somos America v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  4. RIVERA-LONGORIA v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. RIVERA-LONGORIA v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API