State v. Delk
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant raises one issue for our consideration. Is the “anti-plea bargain” provision in A.R.S. § 28-692(C) unconstitutional as violative of Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution? The procedural history of the case is as follows.
Appellant was charged in the Scottsdale City Court with violations of A.R.S. §§ 28-692(A) and (B), both class 1 misdemeanors, and other minor traffic infractions. Prior to trial, he entered into a plea agreement with the State. In the agreement appellant agreed to, and did, plead guilty to driving while intoxicated (DWI), in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. VarelaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- We Are America/Somos America v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- RIVERA-LONGORIA v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- RIVERA-LONGORIA v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.