Legal Opinion
Overfield v. Pennroad Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1943No. 258, 938PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
Following the filing of the opinion herein, three investment experts were appointed to advise the Chancellor as to the fairest possible measure of the defendant’s financial liability in accordance with the conclusions and the principles discussed in the opinion. The experts have made a thorough study of the problem and have filed their report giving a comprehensive analysis of the transactions involved, and their combined opinion as to the measure of the damage in each investment instance, with one exception. The report recites that consideration has been given to all of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Eshleman v. KeenanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Central Ry. Signal Co. v. LongdenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Norte & Company v. HuffinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.