Legal Opinion

Electric Gin Co. v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1935No. 3977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, Justice.

This action on a policy of fire insurance failed in the district court because barred by a policy provision that no such suit should be sustainable unless commenced within twelve months next after loss.

Appellant here contends that that stipulation is void as against the public policy of this state, as represented by the general six-year limitation upon suits on written contracts. Its reliance is on Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Spinks, 119 Ky. 261, 83 S. W. 615, 616, 84 S. W. 1160, 26 Ky. Law Rep. 1205, 69 L. R. A. 264, 7 Ann. Cas. 913, a case well in point, and which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Union Central Life Ins. v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nez v. ForneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wiseman v. Arrow Freightways, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Turner v. New Brunswick Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Raja v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  5. Patterson v. Nine Energy Serv., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API