Legal Opinion
State v. DeClaybrook
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 17, 2000No. AC 19076PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendant, Walter DeClaybrook, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following his conditional nolo contendere plea, of one count of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for a speedy trial dated July 24, 1998, as being premature, (2) abused its discretion in deeming his letter to the court dated September 2, 1998, a new motion for a speedy trial and (3) abused its discretion in failing to rule on his motion to dismiss filed on September 30, 1998. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. OberConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Michael A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Fontaine v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CoteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. DeclaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000