Legal Opinion

In re Michael A.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 11, 1997No. AC 16531PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court that removed her as guardian of her minor child and granted the petitioner father sole guardianship and custody of the child pursuant to General Statutes § 45&-610.1

*107The respondent claims that the trial court (1) improperly failed to address the previous order of temporary custody in its ruling regarding guardianship and (2) incorrectly applied the best interests of the child standard of General Statutes § 45a-6052 in reaching its decision. The respondent also claims for the first time on appeal that General…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Schult v. SchultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. United Components, Inc. v. WdowiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Moraski v. Connecticut Board of Examiners of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. In re Jessica M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Fontaine v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. In re Jessica S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API