Legal Opinion
Gothreau v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 12, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
The defendant Westeott Construction Corporation was engaged in constructing a bridge in Putnam for the defendant railroad. The named plaintiff, hereinafter called the plaintiff, was employed by a firm which supplied kerosene to Westeott at the bridge site. Westeott knew that it was the practice of the plaintiff’s employer to require a receipt for all deliveries. On three occasions prior to March 28,1957, the plaintiff delivered kerosene to the project, and on each occasion he sought out Westcott’s foreman at different places around the construction area to obtain a receipt. The plaintiff was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drible v. Village Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Knapp v. Connecticut Theatrical Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Burke v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Esposito v. Hospital of St. RaphaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Kunz v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lombardi v. J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Monahan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Teitelman v. BloomsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Krause v. Bridgeport HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Eastern Electric Construction Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.